space
What I'm Writing
Is Harry Potter Really Fantasy?

The quick and obvious answer to the question is. "Yes. How could it be anything else?" After all, the books have good and evil wizards and magic and flying broomsticks and giant chess games where the pieces move themselves.

But for all that, most of the settings focus around what amounts to a co-ed English boarding school for magicians. Magic doesn't seem to play much of a part in the world at large away from Hogwarts, yet there would seem to be a role for such magic
in the world of the muggles.

The idea of the English boarding school was, variously, to educate young people away from their parents, to instill some sort of background, to prepare them for life, etc., but boarding schools have always been, in many senses, unreal places. So the fact that Hogwarts is unreal isn't that much of a stretch. Nor is the fact that Harry and his friends have to solve problems that seem, and may be, life-threatening. Likewise, studying magic is about as useful as certain aspects of boarding school curricula must have seemed to more than a few students over the years. And in time, the boarding school becomes a far more real place than a "home" where less and less time is spent. In a perverse way, the time Harry spends away from Hogwarts is more of a nightmare than the time he spends at Hogwarts.

For all the trappings of education at Hogwarts, there's precious little on the structure of magic, or even on the structural differences between good and evil. And...if we're talking about fantasy in the tradition of Tolkien, where an author creates an entire world from scratch, with cultures, languages, different economies and technologies, "Harry Potter" tends to come up as enjoyable "fantasy lite."

Now, obviously, fantasy can be anything an author and that author's publisher declare it to be, so long as it's popular and profitable, and the Harry Potter books are certainly both. Also, as a fantasy author, at least part of the time, I'm more than pleased to see young people reading anything, particularly anything that might lead them into reading more, especially more challenging works.

But I still have to ask,"Is Harry Potter really fantasy?" But then, does it really matter?

Comments:
Sir:

I would tend towards the Ray Bradbury definition of fantasy from a 1999 interview with Weekly Wire: "First of all, I don't write science fiction. I've only done one science fiction book and that's Fahrenheit 451, based on reality. Science fiction is a depiction of the real. Fantasy is a depiction of the unreal. So Martian Chronicles is not science fiction, it's fantasy. It couldn't happen, you see?"

In my mind Harry Potter is fantasy not because it isn't following in the trappings of Professor Tolkien, but rather because Jo Rowling is writing about something that could not possibly exist in the world as we know it.

Bradbury's definition is a bit deeper, perhaps, than the superficial one of spaceships = science fiction, magic = fantasy, but both work in this instance.

But, like you ask, it doesn't really matter because hopefully Harry Potter is only the first step in the reading lives of most children.
 
Having read several hundred books that could be considered fantasy I still have no clue how to put sharp boundaries on the genre. Nor do I want to. Frankly it annoys me to no end when people assume a fantasy novel is about an epic struggle between good and evil featuring elves and dwarfs.

If people want to call Harry Potter fantasy that's fine by me. All I know is that I look forward to reading the final book just as much as I look forward to reading the next book in Martin's a Song of Ice and Fire series or Erikson's next Tale of the Malazan Book of the Fallen. And to me, that is what matters.

Rob
Utrecht, the Netherlands
 
Post a Comment



<< Back to all Blog posts

 

News & UpdatesMonhtly QuestionsBlog Entries
www.LEModesittJr.com  |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Notice