space
What I'm Writing
Feminism, Social Change, and Speculative Fiction


The other day I received an interesting response to my blog about the impact of social change in science fiction on readership. The respondent made the point that she felt, contrary to my statements, that fantasy had more social change depicted in it because at least there were more strong female characters in fantasy. Depending on which authors one reads, this is a debatable point, but it raises a more fundamental question. Exactly what are social change -- and feminism -- all about, both in genre literature and society?


The other day there was an interesting article in the Wall Street Journal, which reported on the study of performance of mutual fund managements. The study concluded that the results from funds managed by all-male teams and those by all-female teams were essentially the same. The funds managed by mixed-gender teams reported significantly less profitable returns. The tentative rationale reported for such results was that mixed-gender teams suffered "communications difficulties." Based on my years as a consultant and additional years as an observer of a large number of organizations, I doubt that "communications" are exactly the problem. In mixed-gender organizations, where both sexes have some degree of power and responsibility, I have noted that, almost inevitably, men tend to disregard women and their advice/recommendations to the degree possible. If their superior is a woman, a significant number tend to try to end-run or sabotage the female boss. If the superior is a male, because women professionals' suggestions tend to get short shrift, the organization is handicapped because half the good ideas are missing, either because they're ignored, or because women tend not to make them after a while. Maybe one could call that communications difficulties, but, as a male, I'd tend to call it male ego and insecurity.


What does this have to do with feminism in speculative fiction? A great deal, it seems to me, because merely changing who's in control doesn't necessarily change the dynamics below the top. This is one of the issues I tried to highlight in my own Spellsong Cycle, as well as in some of my science fiction. In "Houston, Houston, Do You Read," the solution proposed by James Tiptree, Jr., [Alice Sheldon] was to eliminate the conflict by eliminating males. As a male, I do have a few problems with that particular approach.


In Sheri Tepper's Gate to Women's Country, the males get to choose to be "servitors" to women or warriors limited to killing each other off, while the "violence" gene [if not expressed in quite those terms] is bred out of the male side of the population.


Ursula K. LeGuin addressed the dynamics of gender/societal structure in The Left Hand of Darkness, suggesting, it seems to me, that a hermaphroditic society would tend to be just as ruthless as a gender polarized-one, if far more indirect, and not so bloodthirsty in terms of massive warfare.


In the end, though, the question remains. In either fiction or life, is feminism, or societal change, about a restructuring of the framework of society... or just about which sex gets to be in charge?


Comments:
As a female in a mostly male work environment, I can agree on many points. My previous supervisor and I spent a lot of time in the back room yelling at eachother because I did his job better than he did and he resented the fact (I resented it too, because I shouldn't have had to do his job, but that's another story).

However, my observations have shown me another factor that would create significantly less profitable returns--the flirt factor. I've sat in on more team meetings where men and women aren't puffing and preening to outdo one another so much as to impress one another.

I agree communications would also be an issue since men and women do NOT think the same. Lack of respect for the opposite sex can also contribute, but I am willing to bet that preening was another major factor in work not getting done. Sitting in on meetings makes me roll my eyes enough to make myself dizzy.
 
I totally agree with you on the Sheri Tepper book. I remember reading THE GATE TO WOMEN'S COUNTRY and saying "servants or arrogant SOB warriors doomed to extinction? Thats the only choice men get?" I could agree with her take on sexist societies like the hillbilly polygamists who capture the protagonist, but I didn't buy that the only alternative to men enslaving women was for women to enslave men. Not much better than the Tiptree solution.

And I have seen similar office situations. I do think it's getting better. I know the younger guys I work with seem much less concerned with their boss's gender.
 
Post a Comment



<< Back to all Blog posts

 

News & UpdatesMonhtly QuestionsBlog Entries
www.LEModesittJr.com  |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Notice