

Writing the Whole Enchilada
On Sunday, July 6th, Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer played an incredible tennis match at
Admittedly, these are semi-anecdotal examples, but from what I've seen, they're definitely representative. In all these cases, American men don't seem terribly interested in perfecting the full range of talents necessary to excel. Current "top-level" American male tennis players don't want to put in the hours and effort to perfect back-court ground strokes and work to obtain the conditioning necessary to scrap for every point in the way John McEnroe and Andre Agassi once did. One noted
All of this applies to writing as well. In its simplest sense, fiction consists of two components -- technical skill in putting words on the page and story-telling. Writers who have great technical skill and write beautifully crafted prose with either limited story-telling or none to speak of [such as in the Ghormenghast Trilogy] aren't complete writers, and won't sell much, if anything. Writers who are technically deficient but who tell great stories are like the top American tennis players -- they'll make money, but they'll never be great.
In any field, to excel requires a mastery of the full range of skills, not just what's easy, or popular, or what brings in the cash, and right now, it seems to me, the interest in popularity and cash is destroying the desire for greatness in all too many fields in the
The unfortunate side effect of this, at least in my experience is that lending your intellect towards something that you don't feel passion towards eventually dulls your creative spark to the point where creativity becomes a 'job' rather than something you genuinely enjoy.
I wonder if this is in some way influencing the overall application of creative talent in the United States...
Other thought: Back when I was in business school, they handed around a questionnaire which included the question, What is your aim in your career? Four choices: make money, gain power, be creative, do good. They then told us that the ones aiming at power made the most money, followed closely by the folks who wanted to make money. The ones who wanted to create important things were a distant third, with the do-gooders (obviously, they were going into non-profits or government) a yet more distant fourth. It certainly should be possible to do high-quality work in the US and still make lots of money, but that doesn't seem to be the typical experience.
<< Back to all Blog posts