

The Future of Fiction? Its meaning?
Over the past few years, there's been what I'd call a desultory, on-and-off debate, if it can be termed such, over the future of books, and of fiction. While few believe that either books or fiction in some form of print will vanish, it's clear that changes are occurring, and those changes both reflect current trends in society and foreshadow future changes.
Over the past decade the number of fiction titles and the number of copies sold are up, but not so much as population growth. Other studies suggest that there actually may be fewer readers, but that those readers are individually buying more books, as a result of the growth of chain bookstores and on-line stores. This possibility is bolstered by the distribution of sales figures as well. With the exception of authors of block-buster works such as Harry Potter, The Da Vinci Code, and the top romances, most authors are writing more books, but the numbers of copies of each title sold tend to be lower. In the F&SF field, more than a few authors who used to be mid-list authors published by major houses are now being published by smaller houses, even while they're getting quite favorable reviews and positive critical attention. Recent surveys also indicate that fiction reading has dropped off enormously among the 16-25 year old age-group.
What do these changes mean? For one thing, I personally believe that they largely reflect a change in personal entertainment preferences, and that change is driven, in large part, by the impact of technology on our lives and in the corresponding transformation of the nature of work. A greater and greater percentage of work has moved from physical labor to tasks requiring mental efforts or services with social interaction, if not both, and the hours worked have not decreased in the
Bookstores are also carrying larger and larger sections of graphic novels, anime, and manga. This isn't totally surprising, given that younger Americans are a more video/visual entertainment generation, which also explains the growth of video/computer games. The concern that I have about this shift is that reading, fiction in particular, requires the reader to construct a mental image of the setting and the events, rather than merely to observe and participate, as is the case for visually-based entertainment.
Where will these changes in entertainment preferences lead society as a whole? Will they have that great an effect? Some preliminary studies suggest that the brain development of the video generation is different, but I haven't seen any work that says what the change in development does to perception and behavior. Some differences that I've observed and that concern me are: (1) the younger generation seems to have a greater difficulty in visualizing or imagining things described only in words; (2) they have more difficulty in transferring skills learned in one application to a different application; (3) their writing skills, in general, are far weaker than those of earlier generations; (4) while constructing and supporting statements/arguments logically and factually has always been difficult for students, that difficulty seems even greater now than in earlier generations.
Even assuming that my observations are true and hold for a larger body of young Americans than I've observed, will they affect the future of the
Based on history, one has to wonder. Certainly, a significant number and great percentage of our ancestors either could not read or never read fiction. In fact, the first recognized novel [Pamela, by
In the end, the question may not be about how many people are reading fiction, but who those readers happen to be, and what they take from it.
I agree with your observations and add one of my own about the younger generation: They cannot easily remember information presented orally (unless they take notes). I first observed this among a few college students I knew in the 1970s. It seems much more prevalent now.
I opened a few of my lectures (in medical school) by saying, "You will not need to take notes. All the facts in this lecture are in your textbook. Just listen and remember as much as you can." Many students could not refrain from taking notes. I experimented with the "no notes" lectures because health care professionals need to listen to and look at their patients. Looking away and jotting (or typing) notes while the patient is speaking is rude. Clinicians should listen, remember, and record the pertinent information after the visit. Few of the new generation of health care professionals can do that.
Unfortunately, I can't.
People of my age tend not to read much or often, and when they do the trend is to read novels below the age range.
I quizzed my teens. Neither could diagram a sentence to save their own life. In parent teacher conferences last night, I found out English class consisted of the forced reading of 1500 pages of in 6 weeks, writing rap-like poems, and learning vocabulary words that might be on the ACT. Language is a chore to be gotten through.
I think in the future everything will be like an iPhone, push button with pretty pictures. We'll regress to pictographs.
I want to be buried with my dictionary and thesaurus.
<< Back to all Blog posts