space
What I'm Writing
The Illusion of Permanence
A week or so ago, a number of Facebook users got extremely irritated when Facebook tried to change its terms of service to claim the rights of all content posted there in perpetuity. On the surface, that seems to be a bit extreme and might warrant an outcry.

Except... is anything electronic and on the web really permanent? Just look at how fast sites change. Exactly where is the record of what was there yesterday... or last week... let alone last month or last year?


I got to thinking about this for the latest time when I considered my Boeing Graph program. It was a wonderful graphing tool back when I was doing computer graphics for various businesses. It still might be, except that I never bothered to convert the 5 1/2 inch floppies into another format, and I haven't had a computer with that capability for years, nor have I seen a version of it for sale in an updated format. In fact, I still use 3 inch disks, and I've been informed that they're nearly obsolete. And I'm still using Word 7.0 to write books, because it will also access all the older WordPerfect files so that I don't have to convert some twenty years of writing and notes. And besides, it doesn't require as much use of the mouse, which is an advantage for someone who likes the keyboard. Yes, I know, I could program or learn all the alternative keystrokes for the current version of Word, at least until there's another newer and improved version. But it's not just me. There's all sorts of NASA data that's virtually lost because the electronic systems have changed and because no one thought to convert it -- or perhaps they didn't have the budget to do so.


That's the thing about paper. We still have books that are hundreds of years old. They may be fragile, but just how much of all the electronic data we're archiving right now is really going to be accessible in a decade or two, let alone a century? My wife has pointed out that all the old letters in her grandmother's trunk were priceless. They showed how people thought and felt. Somehow, I don't see my grandchildren being able to even find my emails. More than a few times, I've been able to go back and dig out data from my old consulting reports -- those that I was smart enough to print out. I'd be surprised if much of that data exists anywhere else.


And, by the way, there are a few institutions and even one religion that keep revising their tenets. You can see this when you compare print versions, but such comparisons get harder and harder when everything's electronic.


I haven't mentioned the problem of servers and their impermanence, either. Or electronic worms and viruses. The old-fashioned book worms took months, if not years, to destroy a single book. The electronic variety can wipe out entire databases in instants. Something like ten years ago, a movie called The Net came out, and it showed exactly what could happen in a society with too great a reliance on electronic systems and too few safeguards. Certainly, there are greater safeguards today than people envisioned back then, but think about the President's proposal to set up universal electronic medical records. Yes, those records can be accessed from anywhere, but that also means they can be altered or destroyed from anywhere. With paper records in each hospital, someone intent on destroying large amounts of records would have to visit every hospital. Not so once everything's electronic.


The most obvious price for easier electronic access and convenience is potentially greater vulnerability. There's also another price, and that's mandatory standardization, because standardization also increases vulnerability.


It's certainly a lot more convenient to manipulate electronic text, and it's been a boon to all of those of us who write, but I would note that all my contracts with my publisher specify that I'm supposed to keep a "hard" copy of every book... just in case.


What will happen if we end up going to E-books, because paperbacks and hardcovers are too expensive?


We can still read Sumerian, Babylonian, Hittite, and Egyptian texts thousands of years old, especially those inscribed on clay. I have my doubts about the survival of much current and future "literature" disseminated as electrons on a screen, but then, given where entertainment is headed, that might just be a blessing.



Comments:
And, by the way, there are a few institutions and even one religion that keep revising their tenets. You can see this when you compare print versions, but such comparisons get harder and harder when everything's electronic.

Sounds a lot like 1984. Winston's job was to "revise" past issues of the Times. Certainly a lot of politicians would love the ability remove all evidence of anything they've said wrong in the past.

Making information universally accessible is a great thing as long as there's a hard copy to back it up somewhere. There are many people in the world who've benefited greatly from widespread internet access. And, as with anything, there are drawbacks to go along with the advantages. Just ask any teacher grading a student submitted report that uses wikipedia as a source.
 
My feelings about electronic versus paper are exactly the opposite of Mr. Modesitt's. I scan all of my paper household records (bills, statements, invoices, warranties, correspondence, etc.), make two backups, and throw the paper away. I have a logical filing system and can find any of my former paper documents in just a few seconds.

I digitized all my photos using a film strip scanner. The negatives are in the freezer, and the prints are in albums or envelopes, but the electronic versions are much easier to access. All photos are labeled by date and given categories, keywords, and (if relevant) people labels. So, if I want to see all photos of my eldest daughter's birthday parties, it takes just one mouse click.

I see no advantages to maintaining paper copies of most documents. (I'm not referring to books.) The issue of outdated formats is easily handled by using standard formats (text, rtf, pdf, jpeg, tiff) when possible and converting documents created with orphaned applications. So, my old WordPerfect files got converted to Word, my MacDraw files got converted to Canvas, and soon my Canvas files will get converted to tiff or pdf. Most such tasks can be automated to minimize the tedium.
 
LOL

Dr T can you converse on anything without slapping yourself on the back?

Yes I will get around to your ignorant rant against wealth redistribution and communism, one day!

Sorry I have little interest in you, but luckily you make up for that, by being so interested in yourself!

By the way, I do applaud you studying, to lift yourself from being Mr T to Dr T well done, how's the anger management going?? :-)
 
I would personally like to thank you for agreeing to let Imager become an audiobook. I have Dislexa and while my mom and sister have been long term fans of your I could never read the books. :( I have had to sit thru sooo many dinners wishing I could read the books my mom and sister where talking about but knowing that if I opened them all I'd fine was a mess of letters floating around the page. I understand great works should be in hard copy but also understand there are people who would love to be fans but aren't able to read the hard copy. Please let your work become more accessible! :)
 
Post a Comment



<< Back to all Blog posts

 

News & UpdatesMonhtly QuestionsBlog Entries
www.LEModesittJr.com  |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Notice